Indian Future Aircraft

The Indian Air Force currently operates around 250 MiG-21 aircraft. On account of metal fatigue and dated equipment, several MiG-21s used in training roles have crashed over the past six years, killing over 50 IAF pilots. Also, they are nearing the end of their service life having been in the IAF for many decades and are being decommissioned at an increasing pace. The IAF initially planned to replace the MiG-21 fleet with indigenously-built HAL Tejas aircraft by 2006. However, the target could not be met due to developmental delays and a US sanction, following the Pokhran-II nuclear tests, which blocked the delivery of GE F404 engines - a crucial component of the LCA.

The Indian Air Force has a requirement for combat aircraft to replace the MiG-21 in service. The Mirage-2000 were considered as a replacement. However, Dassault announced that it has shut down the assembly line of the Mirage-2000. Hence the IAF included the Mig-29M/M2, Gripen and F-16 in its itinerary of consideration. This was the first time in the IAF's history that an American aircraft was being considered. Later the number of manufacturers was widened to include heavy-weight aircraft like the F/A-18 Super Hornet, the Eurofighter Typhoon, and Dassault Rafale. In an interview, the then Air Chief of the IAF M. Shahindra Pal Tyagi admitted to allowing heavy-weight aircraft to compete, "to allow more competition".

The limited series production of the indigenous LCA Tejas aircraft is ongoing at Hindustan Aeronautics Limited. The aircraft is supposed to get full operational clearance by 2010-12, as the Tejas' development has been accelerated. It is believed that the MRCA's procurement may take a much longer time than Tejas' induction in the IAF, and its subsequent mass production. The air force has issued an Intent (RoI) for procurement of MRCA (Multi Role Combat Aircraft). The following aircraft are participating: Russian MiG-35, French Rafale, European Eurofighter Typhoon, Swedish Gripen and the US F-16C. Besides the F-16Cs, the US has also offered the sale of F-16 Block 70 and F/A-18E/F Super Hornet combat aircraft. IAF pilots and technicians are familiar with earlier aircraft from MiG and Dassault and would need minimal retraining. Infrastructural and logistical support for maintenance and spares would also be easier for these aircraft compared to the unfamiliar Gripens, F-16s and F/A-18s. Moreover, many analysts feel that the US, whose unpredictable foreign policy might clamp sanctions at any time, cannot be a reliable supplier[citation needed].

Apart from the 126 multi-role combat aircraft, 180 Su-30MKI air superiority fighters (out of the 230 Su-30MKI fighters ordered, 80 are already in service with the IAF), 220 Light Combat Aircraft, 29 Jaguar combat aircraft, 4 Tu-22M3 bombers, the Indian Air Force has signed contracts for 66 BAE Hawk-132 trainers (deliveries in the pipeline), 80+ combat helicopters, 3 new Long Range UAVs, 8 mid-air refueling planes, 225+ HJT-36 Sitara Intermediate Jet Trainer aircraft and some additional medium-range transport aircraft. The Indian Air Force plans to upgrade its fleet of Mirage 2000 and MiG-29 aircraft.

Visit Our Site :- Web Directory of Mobile Country - Premium web directory - Bidding Directory

China plans for war

While the details of Chinese military plans are secret, the general strategy isn’t. The weapons, equipment and techniques its military uses, and discusses in professional journals, makes it clear just how the Chinese plan to fight U.S. forces in the next war. Many Chinese military experts describe the U.S. as China’s principal foe and that some kind of conflict is inevitable. The Chinese military doesn’t plan to destroy U.S. forces, instead through attacks via the Internet and electronic warfare the Chinese will disrupt them. The Chinese have also developed insights into the details of how the U.S. Armed Forces operate and will adapt their tactics to exploit any U.S. weaknesses.

US military deaths in Iraq war at 4,094

As of Monday, June 9, 2008, at least 4,094 members of the U.S. military have died in the Iraq war since it began in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

The figure includes eight military civilians killed in action. At least 3,335 died as a result of hostile action, according to the military's numbers.

The AP count is the same as the Defense Department's tally, last updated Monday at 10 a.m. EDT.

The British military has reported 176 deaths; Italy, 33; Ukraine, 18; Poland, 21; Bulgaria, 13; Spain, 11; Denmark, seven; El Salvador, five; Slovakia, four; Latvia and Georgia, three each; Estonia, Netherlands, Thailand, Romania, two each; and Australia, Hungary, Kazakhstan, South Korea, one death each.

Other uses of "Military"

Military procurement refers to common regulations and requirements for a ship or a detached unit to requisition and draw on a base's facilities (housing, pay, and rations for detached personnel), supplies (most commonly food stocks or materials, and vehicles) by the service running a primary base; e.g. Army units detached to or staging through an air base, a vessel calling at a port near an army or air base, an army unit drawing supplies from a naval base.

Military strength is a term that describes a quantification or reference to a nation's standing military forces or the capacity for fulfillment of that military's role. For example, the military strength of a given country could be interpreted as the number of individuals in its armed forces, the destructive potential of its arsenal, or both.

Military strength is a term that describes a quantification or reference to a nation's standing military forces or the capacity for fulfillment of that military's role. For example, the military strength of a given country could be interpreted as the number of individuals in its armed forces, the destructive potential of its arsenal, or both.


Military force is a term that might refer to a particular unit, a regiment or gunboat deployed in a particular locale, or as an aggregate of such forces (Example: "In the Gulf War the United States Central Command controlled military forces (units) of each of the five military services of the United States.

A military brat is a colloquial term for a child with at least one parent who served full-time in the armed forces. Children of armed forces members may move around to different military bases or international postings, which gives them an unusual childhood. Unlike common usage of the term brat, when it is used in this context, it is not necessarily a derogatory term.

Thinking about joining the military

Thinking about joining the military? Get the scoop, get in the know, and make an informed decision.

Step 1: Learn about the military
Find out military basics: what they do, where they go, and who they are.

Step 2: Decide if you're ready
Get a handle on the basics of joining: eligibility, benefits information, and branch missions.

Step 3: Choose the right path
Find the best point of entry for you: compare services, consider guard and reserve services, compare enlisted vs. officer, and look at your job choices.

Step 4: Meet the recruiter
How do you handle meeting recruiters? Find out questions and answers, secrets to visiting a recruiter, documents you'll need, incentives and more.

Step 5: Ace the ASVAB
If you will be enlisting, you need to ace the ASVAB! Our special ASVAB section will help you get the best score possible.

Step 6: Get the best job
You want to join - now make sure you will be doing what you like! Find an interest matcher, tips on finding the right job, and overviews of all jobs in each branch here.

Step 7: Complete the process
Let us take out the fear and confusion about MEPS: find out about medical conditions, waivers, how to handle legal problems, and more.

Step 8: Raise your right hand
Your about to swear in: find out about the oaths you'll take, the general orders you need to learn, military ranks, and more.

Step 9: Get ready for bootcamp
Are you ready to be challenged? Get the skinny on how to prepare yourself mentally and physically.

Step 10: You're in! Make the most of it.
What happens after boot camp? How do you make a success of yourself? Find out tips and get advice from those who have been there.

Future of Indian Army

The Indian Army has commonly been manpower intensive, which abounding avant-garde intellects abuse as a hangover from the Second or even the First World War era. But it accept to be accepted that these credible anachronisms amble on even at present, due to assertive bread-and-butter as able-bodied as operational compulsions.

At one level, the disability of the Indian Army to afford manpower is due to abridgement of assets to alter it with high-end technologies, primarily because of the about low antecedence accorded to aegis planning, and bare ability allotment. In the absence of equipment, manpower accelerated alternatives, somehow accept to abide about by default. The unsatisfactory hybridization, which created the accepted Reorganized Army Plains Infantry Division – RAPID – is a acceptable archetype of this. In this case, the bounded anatomy was bargain by a brigade, on the acceptance that manpower appropriately bargain would be replaced by force multipliers and surveillance.

Needless to say, the Army waited for these in vain, because the banking assets for the abstruse makeover were artlessly never allotted. It is to be apparent whether these difficulties will abide in approaching as well. By present indications, it seems that they would still be about for absolutely some time. At addition level, abundance and boscage area in the arctic and eastern regions accumulated with all-encompassing deployments on adverse insurgency, accustomed operational imperatives for organizations with able manpower. Here, arduous technology, admitting helpful, was not the assertive factor, and there was no acting for numbers of acquiescent ‘boots on the ground’, as American armament in Iraq are acutely acquirements the harder way. So, in New Age organizations, manpower against technology will accept to be implemented anxiously and judiciously. At present, there is an acute agitation aural the aggressive and the blow of the cardinal association on the appearance of warfare in the future, and the blazon of army appropriate to accommodated approaching threats.

Will a acceptable accepted army, even if technologically upgraded, be able to handle these if they occur? Now that the action of re-construction is already beneath way, what affectionate of an Army 2020 should appear at the end of it? How and to what admeasurement will it or can it reflect the operational compulsions of that approaching time? The acknowledgment to these and added agnate questions accept to be acutely understood, which is that Indian Army 2020 accept to absorb the basal agreement of a accepted army, and not be mutated by abolitionist doctrinal anaplasty into some affectionate of abundant constabulary. The New Army accept to acquire basal multi-role operational capabilities beyond the absolute spectrum of conflict, whether nuclear, conventional, or low intensity.

They are adjustable abundant for structured regrouping for assorted contingencies. Changes to the absolute arrangement should be alien alone afterwards accurate deliberation.

Military Casualties of World War One

The 'Great War', which began on 28 July 1914 with Austria-Hungary's declaration of war with Serbia, and which ended with the German armistice of 11 November 1918, produced a vast number of casualties and deaths - and similarly vast numbers of missing soldiers.

The precise numbers remain shrouded in the passing of time compounded by the incompleteness of available records. In the heat of action accurate records were not always kept, and where they were, these were not uncommonly lost in subsequent actions, such were the conditions of trench warfare.

Thus the figures reproduced below cannot be regarded as definitive but are a fair reflection of the scale of losses country by country.

Note too that these statistics reflect military casualties only; no reliable figures are available for civilian casualties throughout the world. Attributing civilian casualties to the effects of war is a subjective process at best; the scale of the First World War certainly resulted in an absence of even the most approximate figures for affected nations.